Measuring Training Effectiveness for our Security Deployment: Part One

written by Mrs. Marisa Gana Amir
The Background

One of the challenges we as managers face when deploying our security measures is the lack of our ability to assess the effectiveness of our security deployment’s training. The following is the first of two posts dealing with this major challenge.

Organizations must respond to an array of threats by deploying a competent and professional security force to protect its assets. They must ensure that proper, effective and cost efficient training is conducted to prepare those personnel to face a wide range of challenges. Too often training is insufficient or none existent in the private sector because many companies believe it to be too costly. There are usually no quality control programs and no attempt is made to evaluate training effectiveness.

Generally, security deployments are based on three main parameters: people, processes and technology. The manpower we use to implement the security process is important to the success of our deployment. The security doctrine and SOPs entail a variety of duties that security officers have to execute such as patrolling, x-ray screening and access control at entrances to the entities, taking all relevant risks (terror and criminal) into consideration.

Once we have recruited the right personnel, instilling the SOPs and the doctrine has to be carried out in the most cost effective manner available. . The method of training is determined by the complexity of the officers’ duties, the level of the officers and the availability of resources. One of the most important actions in training these officers is that the training be standardized and that all officers performing the same job receive the same training.

And yet, how do we measure training effectiveness?

The best known evaluation methodology for measuring the effectiveness of training programs was published in the late 50’s by Donald Kirkpatrick.The structure of the model has 4 levels, each level is equally important:

  • Level 1 – reaction: how did the participants react to the training?
  • Level 2- learning: at the workplace- what did the participant learn as a result of the training?
  • Level 3- behavior: did the participant change his behavior as a result of the training?
  • Level 4- result: business results- what is the effect on the company\ organization?

Summary

Problems in training become obvious for the first time when a security incident occurs and the employee responds incorrectly. Therefore building a good, effective training program into the regular schedule of the security operation will not only reduce the risk of an incident occurring and minimize the effect of incidents when they occur, but will also, reduce the costs and liability to the organization. The next post will go into further detail into each level describing the security consequences.

By Mrs. Marisa Gana Amir – senior project manager – Lotan Security

Mrs. Gana Amir served as the manager for Ben Gurion Airport’s (Tel-Aviv) security screening unit.  As the unit manager, Mrs. Gana was responsible for developing, recruiting, personnel quality assessment and training the security screening staff of Ben Gurion airport. Mrs. Gana Amir also served as a senior instructor, in charge of training security personnel starting from junior positions, to mid and senior security supervisors.

 

 

This entry was posted in training and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Measuring Training Effectiveness for our Security Deployment: Part One

  1. Buster says:

    Thx for spending some time to describe the terminlogy towards the novices!

  2. Martina says:

    Thx for spending some time to describe the terminlogy towards the learners!

  3. I congratulate, excellent idea and it is duly

  4. a good discussion can be started on this post,as i do not fully agree with you,but nevertheless,good post.

  5. Thank you
    We value your opinion and recommend to view our next posts

  6. I have been meaning to post something like this on my blog and this gave me an idea. Cheers.

  7. It’s pretty intriguing that the traditional media has changed the way in which it talks about this recently dont you think? What once appeared like a never ever discussed issue has become more prevelant. It’s time to change our stance about this though.

  8. Not a bad article,if truth be told truly excellent one.yet unfortunately I seriously miss that you really didn’t convey viewpoint in depth, but its ok you simply have dissimilar way of crafting.

  9. your blog ranks high on aol and i also should say your steady writing style justifies your blog to be in such high positions.i savored your writing style.thanks.

  10. GREAT REVIEW! I totally agree with all you said in your post, especially at the middle of your article. Thank you, your post is very valuable as always. Keep up the good work! You’ve got +1 more reader of your blog:) Isabella S.

  11. This post is one of those on which an interactive argument can be started as i differ from you on this, but nonetheless great quality post.

  12. Tabatha Null says:

    This post is one of those on which an interactive argument can be started as i differ from you on this, but nonetheless great quality post.

  13. as you may know very well than me these days blogs are cropping up all over the place.most people starting such blogs think,they can write anyway and anything on there blog which is definately not true.but your blog solely stands out for your writing style,it is actually quite engrossing.keep at it.

  14. i still dont know whether i agree with you on this one or not. but its good arumentative post.

  15. this post was written some time ago and many prospects have changed since then.nevertheless thanks for bringing up this topic on your blog.

  16. everytime i visit your blog i find atleast one post that interests me.your content never ceases to engage me.

  17. hello!a bit offtopic but can you tell how much does it cost to setup a blog?not a expensive and good looking one like yours,but a small normal one?

  18. Hi, this is actually a nice posting. You get my vote for Measuring Training Effectiveness for our Security Deployment: Part One | LotanSecurity and also I’ll bookmark your blog right now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>