Sony & US administration surrender to act of terror

A common definition of terrorism refers to acts that intend to create fear. Targeting a primal anxiety was the intention of the cyber attack carried out against Sony pictures and the threats carried out against theaters showing the film.34306114001_3949349728001_video-still-for-video-3949506929001

to all of our surprise, it worked!!!!

The Sony hacking saga took a sinister turn on Tuesday when hackers sent a message and threatened to target theaters showing “The Interview” in a 9/11 type attack. Major movie chains said they would not show the film and actors James Franco and Seth Rogen have already canceled all media appearances promoting their film.

A Sony spokesman said the company had no further release plans for the film, in its statement, Sony also said the company was “the victim of an unprecedented criminal assault against our employees, our customers, and our business. Those who attacked us stole our intellectual property, private emails, and sensitive and proprietary material, and sought to destroy our spirit and our morale.”

States, organizations and the general public have been targets for many years to constant acts of terrorism and yet they continue to prosper.

how is that possible?

The answer is that they establish and develop resiliency, just like the adaptive species Charles Darwin described in his work  “On the origin of species” and the “anti-fragile” philosophy presented by Nassim Taleb.

Part of developing this resilience can be attributed to the fact that organizations and the general public carry out a system of risk analysis and role playing allowing individuals and organizations to better prepare themselves for adverse events.

and yet from time to time we find ourselves asking “how did we not prepare ourselves for this event” as we are sure Sony pictures are now asking themselves.

Lotan Strategic Gaming (LSG) simulations encourages our customers to develop new pic8skills, ideas and practices while using game based learning thus putting theory into practice in a fail-safe environment. Our learning methodology develops tactical and strategic ways of thinking and effective deployment as part of a holistic approach to the organization’s challenges.

Experience shows us that only by experiencing by ourselves can we truly evaluate and learn to be better. Using Lotan Strategic Gaming active platform is a solution that will help us answer the main question that needs answering:

Are we prepared?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Happy Holidays from Lotan Group

Picture1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Suicide Bomber from U.S. flew Home

Law enforcement and intelligence agencies estimate that the threat of using suicide attackers to attack targets in the U.S or Europe is no longer considered a low probability event. The US born terrorist Abu-Salha had returned to the United States for several months after receiving training by an extremist group in Syria is an appropriate example to this estimate. According to the agencies over 1,000 Westerners including approximately 100 Americans and more than 350 Belgians had received training and gained practical combat experience in Syria. Counter terrorism officials in both Europe and the United States have long said they consider the return of their radicalized citizens from Syria a looming threat.

This recent turn of events raises the question of the use of risk-based intelligence driven screening as an ongoing security concept.

Abu Hurayrah al- ameriki known as Moner Mohammad Abusalha, 22 years old, Florida-born college dropout, chose to carry out his attack in Syria rather than in the United States, but in a alarming new video, the US-born jihadist warned America that “we are coming for you. You think you’re safe where you are, in America or Britain or Indonesia or Jordan or China or Russia or Somalia or Africa? You are not safe…we are coming for you. Mark my words.”

American officials are still piecing together Abu-Salha’s travels between his two Syria trips but the fact is that a radical suicide terrorist with the intention of attack came on board international and domestic flights.

Intelligence and other law enforcement agencies are blamed for missing the terrorist travels, not detecting red flags, allowing him to fly “below radar” which is exactly what happened when Faruk Abdul-Mutaleb the Christmas-day 2009 bomber tried to blow-up a Northwest airline flight number 253 on route from Amsterdam to Detroit.

There was some information about Abu-Salha according to US officials: “The F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security had some indication at the time of his first trip that Abu salha had traveled to Syria. But they were unaware that he had trained at the Nusra camp and had no information to indicate he planned to take his life, according to the officials. It was only after he arrived in Syria the second time that the United States obtained information about his intention for a suicide attack.”

There have been other occasions when Americans and Europeans have received terrorist training overseas and then returned home, unknown to law enforcement agencies. Before he tried to detonate a bomb in Times Square in 2010, Faisal Shahzad, a naturalized American from Pakistan, received explosives training at a camp run by the Pakistani Taliban. Another American, David Headley, made several trips to Pakistani training camps run by the group Lashkar-e-Taiba and helped scout targets for the group, which carried out the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai. The French citizen Mehdi Nemmouche, had fought with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, and is accused of shooting four people in the Jewish Museum on May 24 2014 and the Dutch soldier known to us as Yilmaz who became a Jihadist in Syria.

Analyzing these events we can find one thing in common, though many successes are related to the intelligence community and its systems, security deployments must continue to rely on their own abilities to deal with these threats as if they were a standalone system devoid of any intelligence reports. And as we see the rise of these high threat passengers we understand even more that these security deployments cannot rely on the one size fits all concept being used today.

But there is a silver lining in the sky as we see a rise in the use of Risk Based Screening by many security deployments around the world, the use of Threat Indicators as a system to detect these high threat passengers is proving to be more useful than before especially as we continue to understand how to synergize the Human Component with emerging Technologies.

And as the threat grows and as we understand that the intelligence community can only stop part of these events, policy makers must allow greater freedom to security organizations to implement the risk-based screening under strict rule of human rights and privacy.

Posted in Aviation Security, security Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Strategic Simulations as an answer to Nassim Taleb’s “AntiFragile” concept

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, one of great philosophers our time, author of The Black Swan has revealed his new concept of “Antifragile“, a philosophical approach on how to thrive in an uncertain world. In The Black Swan theory, Nassim Taleb showed that highly improbable and unpredictable events trigger almost everything in our world.

TalebIn Antifragile, Nasim Taleb proposes that many things in life come as a result of stress, disorder, volatility, and turmoil. What Taleb has identified and calls “Antifragile” is that there are many events that not only have something to gain from chaos but in fact need it in order to survive and flourish.

 

As part of this new theory Taleb identifies fragility everywhere and mentions that fragile-persons in their attempt to try and manage it all, in fact make it more fragile; from the medical doctor who damages the body’s natural ability to heal and uses drugs with serious side effects and vast implications, to the finance expert that uses models to measure risks, that in the past have already destroyed the banking system.

All these efforts, Taleb argues, “weaken our health, our economy, political life, education, almost everything, by suppressing the randomness and volatility.”

Taleb claims that in the case of a certain aspects of life such as technology, the need for stability leads to maintaining and preservation but if you do the same things to organs, such as the human body, you in fact harm them. If you take a child and prevent him from experiencing a variety of situations, this child would die the instant he is exposed to bacteria and that the same rules are apply to other fields such as politics and economics.

Nassim Taleb believes that we should reverse the trend: stop trying to impose order on reality, begin to accept the fact that the world is unpredictable and learn how to benefit from disorder. “I want to live a happy life in the world I do not understand”, he formulates the Antifragile goal.

How do we deal with an unpredictable world? Taleb introduces the notion we maybe cannot expect extreme events, but we definitely must try to manage risks. Our biggest mistake, he says, is that instead of managing our risks we try to take over the randomness, avoid the unforeseen events and according to Taleb, this is a recipe for disaster.

So how do we manage our risks?

It is our experience that in order for an organization to be able to manage its risks it has to be able to understand how it acts (or reacts) in the presence of adverse events. We would like to point out that the majority of organizations do not really know how they will react when these events occur.

In the last few months we have seen the surge of events that are the result of “black Swan” and “(Anti)fragile” thinking which have led to catastrophic events (both Malaysia airline events for one) which emphasize this point.

We at Lotan Group argue that the use of Strategic Computerized Gaming for serious gaming, enables the organization the “feeling” and understanding of how their organization behaves under duress thus leading them through a learning process enabling them to manage their risks and come out stronger at the other end.

We invite you to visit www.lotansecurity.com  and  http://youtu.be/xFmO8J340fM   to learn more about Lotan Strategic gaming.

Posted in security Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Safe Cities 2014

Dear colleagues We at Lotan HLS & Defense are proud to present the video from Safe Cities Asia 2014 where 21 participants from various entities engaged in a Strategic GamingIMG_9490 event in Singapore. Participants included, Mayors, City councilmen, Law enforcement agencies, Emergency Management Agencies, Airport officials and private companies working together to save the city of “Prope Civitatem”

see the video from the event:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are we prepared for the next Crimea or Flight MH370?

The passing week has been very eventful and presses forward many questions on both these events.  Many a strategist will appear in the media on one of these events with his/her analysis and maybe they will even be right…

But the real question that needs to be answered is, “Are We Prepared”?  Have we been able to prepare ourselves for the unpredictable chain of events that will next rock our world? Have we used the times of calm and routine operations to analyze and predict our reactions to the unpredictable chain of events that may happen next?

We all know that in a world were risk management has become the epicenter of our operations we cannot prepare ourselves for each and every scenario and yet the effects of these unpredicted events can cripple us.

For some time we have been seeing  that implementing a multiplayer role-based approach where the main focal point of the system is not an exact image of the “battlefield and its players”, but rather, creating a dynamic environment, completely flexible, allowing Strategic Scenarios and sustaining processes of thinking and planning in relation to them. This concept is based on the approaches and methodologies of role-playing games (Role Play) and War Games (War Gaming).

Many organizations be they commercial, financial or even governmental have started to use this approach in order to Predict future challenges, Develop new procedures, Examine preparedness, Train & Practice their organizations and Examine new concepts & strategies.

The approach allows organizations to simulate events thus test their preparedness (be it new competition, product recall, safety event, terror attack or even internal unrest) in a “safe” environment thus we see a new aspect of Risk Management or as managers have started to say “The Future of Risk Management is Present

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Strategic Gaming

In an ever changing world, organizations must respond quickly and effectively to its challenges in order to survive. They must be able to:

  • Predict the meaning of future challenges.
  • Develop comprehensive response practices and procedures.
  • Examine the quality of preparedness.
  • Train and Practice their employees to be prepared.
  • Examine new management concepts and strategies.

 

Lotan Strategic Gaming engages people to develop new skills, ideas and practices while using Game based learning thus putting theory into practice in a fail-safe environment.lotan-strategic-gaming-logo-for-web

Our game-based learning methodology develops strategic thinking and effective strategic deployment as part of a holistic  approach to the organization’s challenges.

for whom is Strategic Gaming useful?

  1. Banking
  2. Tourism
  3. Aviation
  4. Government
  5. Schools
  6. Private firms

In short…

Anyone who wants to improve his organization’s ability to make good decisions

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wishing our Friends in China a Happy New Year of The Horse

Picture1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When Will the First “Dirty-Bomb” Explode?

written by Itay Levin & Dotan Sagi

Looking at the chain of events in the past few years, we find ourselves asking many questions:war-tech-dirty-bomb-200

  • Can we predict the adversary M.O?
  • Will the Sochi winter Olympic Games be bloody?
  • When will the first “dirty-bomb” explode?
  • Are we about to witness the use of WMD by terrorist group anytime soon?
  • Can we foresee future events?

It was common wisdom in the past that strategic thinking is an art (Sun Tzu – The Art of War 2500 years ago) now we find ourselves thinking in new ways, combining art and science;

Strategic thinking prevails in many areas of life and is still considered an art and science, but the basics for Modern Strategic thinking is based on the developments in “Gaming Theory”.

The science of “Gaming Theory” is relatively young and in recent years has proven useful in providing insights into effective military strategies but has since then has shifted its center of gravity to business strategy.

One of the main features in Strategic Gaming is the use of simulation to answer strategic questions such as those that appeared in the beginning of this post. The main objective of this simulation is to improve the decision making process in the organization.

Participants in the gaming process operate in a virtual surrounding, which simulates future scenarios. The game reflects prevailing operational procedures designed to confront critical strategic dilemmas. The participating players represent competitors, suppliers, rivals, experts, government authorities, media outfits etc. The unique interactive nature of the strategic gaming simulation creates a dynamic learning experience that by itself improves working and operational procedures and consequently helps the client optimize stated goals and objectives.

Experience shows us that only by looking at others or experiencing by ourselves can we truly evaluate and learn to be better. Using Game Theory based on a Strategic Gaming practical platform is a solution that will help us answer the main question that needs answering:

Are we prepared?

Posted in security Philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Will the “Black-Widows” deliver a gift for Sochi’s winter Olympic Games And will it contain Radiological Components?

Volgograd, formerly known as the city of Stalingrad has been attacked twice in 48 hours and it is a city in a state of shock. It is believed, that an extremist Islamic group is responsible for the two attacks.
The attacks taking place in the last two days, one at the city’s central railway station and another on a bus killed dozens of people and raised anxieties about the safety of the Olympics.

The Target:
Choosing Volgograd is a major rail hub in Russia and when travelling from Moscow or other parts of central Russia to Sochi, you travel through Volgograd. It’s also the rail station you travel through to get to and from the North Caucasus. The north Caucasus conflict goes back many years and has exacted a heavy toll on both sides. Chechens have laid claim to land in the Caucasus Mountains region for more than 5,000 years. The standard of living in the republics is poor compared with the rest of Russia. Unemployment is rampant and infant mortality is high. In addition, the Chechen population of about 1 million is mostly made up of Sunni Muslims, who maintain a distinctly different cultural and linguistic identity from Russian Orthodox Christians.
The Attacker:
The Siberian Times named the so-called ”Black Widow” as Oksana Aslanova, 26. She was reported as having been married to two Islamic militant leaders killed by Russian forces in the North Caucasus. Chechen women bombers were named “Black Widows” by the Russian and international press when it became clear that many were acting in revenge for the deaths of their husbands, sons, and brothers. Chechnya’s notorious “Black Widows” have been active since June 7, 2000 when the first Chechen female suicide bombers drove a truck filled with explosives into the temporary headquarters of an elite OMON (Russian Special Forces). The attack resulted in two dead and five wounded. Since then Chechen female terrorists have been involved in more than twenty suicide attacks.

So What’s Next?
Terrorists have been interested in acquiring radioactive and nuclear material for use in attacks. For example, in 1995, Chechen extremists threatened to package radioactive material with explosives for use against Russia in order to force the Russian military to withdraw from Chechnya. While no explosives were used, officials later retrieved a package of cesium-137 the rebels had buried in a Moscow park. I believe that with the fact that radioactive material was found in the region (naming Georgia several times….) it is a very probable option.
Following the 9.11 attacks in the USA British authorities have disclosed that terror activists arrested in the USA and England have prepared a document known as the “Final Presentation” in which they have bought up the subject of using Radiological devices. During 2012 and 2013 US experts, UK Deputy Prime-minister and UN Nuclear chief, have warned that this may be a viable threat in the near future.

US officials said US and Russian authorities have engaged in extensive contacts regarding security preparations for Sochi’s Olympic Games. The United States is expected to share with Russia information it might collect about possible threats to the Games but we can see from this week’s events that damaging the Sochi Winter Olympics can be done by targeting other cities…

Happy “Old- New –Year”! счастливый старый новый год !

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment